< Back to latest news & events

News

EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G4/19 – a European patent application can be refused by reason of the prohibition on double patenting

June 2021

The European Patent Office today confirmed in Decision G4/19 of the Enlarged board of Appeal that a European patent application can be refused for ‘double patenting’.  Such a refusal can be made even absent the European Patent Convention having an explicit double patenting provision.

The claiming of the same subject matter in two applications having the same filing or priority date to the same Applicant is referred to as double patenting.  The European Patent Convention does not contain an explicit prohibition against this practice. However, previous decisions against double patenting have relied upon a reference to general principles of patent law in EPC Contracting States embodied in Article 125 EPC.  For example, Section 18(5) of the UK Patents Act provides such an explicit double patenting provision.  It was argued that the double patenting provision embodied in Article 125 EPC only prevented double patenting in the case of applications filed on the same day or between a divisional application and its parent.

The Enlarged Board of Appeal confirmed that Article 125 EPC compelled the EPO to refuse applications for double patenting by taking into account national law of Contracting States.  Furthermore, the Enlarged Board found that double patenting is also prohibited in the case of internal priority i.e. where two applications benefit from the same priority and claim the same subject matter.

It is worth pointing out that the EPO only construes the probation on double patenting narrowly in order to prevent two patents claiming the same identical subject matter.  Therefore, where differences exist between the claims, the double patenting prohibition should not apply.

This article was prepared by HGF Partner Chris Benson. If you would like further advice on this or any other matter, please contact Chris. Alternatively, you can contact your usual HGF representative or visit our Contact page to get in touch with your nearest HGF office.

Latest updates

eControl System’s marketing and selling practices create unfair impression of a commercial connection with AGA

In July 2023, iconic British brand AGA Rangemaster Group Limited (“AGA”) filed a trade mark infringement and copyright complaint directed to eControl System’s[1] second-hand refurbished AGA cookers. The case vindicates …

Read article

Fuelling innovation – The IP Behind Sports Nutrition

The importance of innovation in sporting success With the Euros in full swing and the Olympics on the horizon, this summer elite athletes will be pushed to the limits of …

Read article

UPC issues two first instance decisions on infringement

Last week, just over one year since it became operational, the UPC handed down its first major decision in an infringement action. Here, the UPC met one of its primary …

Read article

Exam Success and Congratulations

We are very proud to share news that some of our colleagues have received fantastic results in the European patent qualifying and the UK Foundation exams! We want to congratulate …

Read article

New Blog Series - Agritech Thymes: A brief look at public prior use of plants in the US

In the US, plants can be protected by utility patents, plant patents and/or plant variety rights. Both types of patent are subject to the same novelty rules of USC §102, …

Read article

Managing IP firm rankings - Patents 2024

HGF would like to announce we have been ranked Tier 1 and Tier 2, and Other Notable Firms in the latest Managing IP firm rankings for patent work. Managing Intellectual …

Read article